Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

SITEMAP.XML • HE

SITEMAP.XML

Validity

Conclusions on validity of protests, requests for redress, and requests to reopen.

Invalid Request to Reopen – Not in Writing (63.7(b))

HE

תקפות

מסקנות בנוגע לתקפות של ערעורים, בקשות לפיצויים ובקשות לפתיחה מחדש.

בקשת פתיחה מחדש לא תקפה – לא בכתב (63.7(b))

Wording

[X] [Y] failed to deliver a written request to reopen the hearing, as required by RRS 63.7(b). Therefore the request to reopen is invalid.

נוסח

[X][Y] כשלה מלהגיש בקשה בכתב לפתיחה מחדש של שמיעה, כפי שנדרש בחוק 63.7(b). לפיכך הבקשה לפתיחה מחדש לא תקפה.

Applicable scenarios

  • Request to reopen not submitted in writing

מתי להשתמש

  • בקשת פתיחה מחדש לא הוגשה בכתב

Related content

Rule 63.7
Previous wordingRequest for Redress Validity – Late on Last Day (61.2(b)(2))Next wordingInvalid Request to Reopen – Did Not Identify Reason (63.7(b))