Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

Validity

Conclusions on validity of protests, requests for redress, and requests to reopen.

Valid Protest – Non-Party Involvement Learned (60.4(c)(2))

Wording

The protest committee learnt during the hearing of a valid protest that the boat, although not a party to the hearing, was involved in the incident and may have broken a rule. Therefore the protest is valid under RRS 60.4(c)(2).

Applicable scenarios

  • Protest valid because PC learned of non-party involvement during hearing

Related content

Rule 60.4
Previous wordingValid Protest – Injury or Serious Damage Despite 60.4(b) (60.4(c)(1))Next wordingValid Protest – Technical Committee Inspection Preceded (60.4(c)(3))