Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

SITEMAP.XML • HE

SITEMAP.XML

Validity

Conclusions on validity of protests, requests for redress, and requests to reopen.

Invalid Protest – Rule 69 or Regulation (60.4(a)(3))

HE

תקפות

מסקנות בנוגע לתקפות של ערעורים, בקשות לפיצויים ובקשות לפתיחה מחדש.

ערעור לא תקף – חוק 69 או תקנה (60.4(a)(3))

Wording

The protest alleges a breach of [RRS 69] [a Regulation referred to in RRS 6] which does not permit a protest by [a boat] [a committee]. Therefore the protest is invalid under RRS 60.4(a)(3).

נוסח

הערעור טוען להפרה של [חוק 69][תקנה אליה מתייחס חוק 6] שאינו מותר לערעור על-ידי [סירה][ועדה]. לכן הערעור אינו תקף על פי חוק 60.4(a)(3).

Applicable scenarios

  • Protest alleges breach of rule that does not allow protest

מתי להשתמש

  • ערעור על הפרת חוק שלא מאפשר ערעור

Related content

Rule 60.4
Previous wordingProtest Uninvolved PartyNext wordingInvalid Protest – Based on Redress or Conflict of Interest (60.4(b))