Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room

ClassNational

Appendix

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Navigation menu

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Home

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room

ClassNational

Appendix

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Navigation menu

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Home

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

SITEMAP.XML • HE

SITEMAP.XML

Protest Conclusions

Conclusions for protests

Rule 10 – WS Case 50 Add-on

מסקנות בערעור

מסקנות לגבי ערעורים

תוספת לחוק 10 – Case 50

Wording

There was reasonable doubt that X could have crossed, if Y had not taken avoiding action (see WS Case 50).

נוסח

היה ספק סביר ש-X היה יכול לחצות, אלמלא Y לא היה נוקט בפעולת הימנעות (ראה Case 50).

Applicable scenarios

Add before RRS 10 conclusion when applying WS Case 50

מתי להשתמש

הוסף לפני מסקנת חוק 10 כאשר מחילים Case 50

Notes

To apply WS Case 50, add before the conclusion for RRS 10

הערות

כדי להחיל את Case 50 הוסף לפני המסקנה עבור חוק 10