Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

Protest Conclusions

Conclusions for protests

Appendix F Presumption Not Overlapped

Wording

Since there was reasonable doubt that X and Y were overlapped, it is presumed that they were not, in accordance with RRS F Definition Clear Astern and Clear Ahead; Overlap.

Applicable scenarios

  • Kiteboard presumption of not overlapped when reasonable doubt exists

Notes

  • To apply this rule, the facts must include that the positions of the kiteboard relative to each other in regard to the overlap could not be established

Related content

CHANGES TO THE DEFINITIONS
Previous wordingInvalid Request to Reopen – Last Day (63.7(b)(1)(2))Next wordingRule 2 Sportsmanship