Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

SITEMAP.XML • HE

SITEMAP.XML

Procedural Matters

Conclusions on procedural matters

Changing the Type of Case RRS 63.2(c)

HE

עניינים פרוצדורליים

מסקנות בנושאי ההליכים (פרוצדוראליים)

שינוי סוג המקרה חוק 63.2(c)

Wording

During the hearing the protest committee clarified in accordance with RRS 63.2(c) that the hearing request was not only a [protest] [...] but also a [request for redress] [...], and proceeded with it accordingly.

נוסח

במהלך השמיעה הבהירה ועדת הערעורים, בהתאמה לחוק 63.2(c) כי בקשת השמיעה אינה רק [ערעור] [...] אלא גם [בקשה לפיצוי] [...], והמשיכה לטפל בה בהתאמה.

Applicable scenarios

  • Reclassifying case type during hearing

מתי להשתמש

  • שינוי סוג המקרה במהלך השמיעה

Related content

Rule 63.2
Previous wordingAppendix T – Post-Race Penalty Taken Before HearingNext wordingInvalid Protest (Definition)