Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

SITEMAP.XML • HE

SITEMAP.XML

Procedural Matters

Conclusions on procedural matters

Reopening – Significant Error or New Evidence (63.7(a)(2)(3))

HE

עניינים פרוצדורליים

מסקנות בנושאי ההליכים (פרוצדוראליים)

פתיחה מחדש – טעות משמעותית או עדות חדשה (63.7(a)(2)(3))

Wording

The protest committee decided that [it may have made a significant error] [new evidence became available within a reasonable time] and reopened the hearing on [date] in accordance with RRS 63.7(a) [(2)][(3)]. The parties [were] [were not] present.

נוסח

ועדת הערעורים החליטה כי [יתכן ועשתה טעות משמעותית][עדות משמעותית חדשה נעשתה זמינה תוך זמן סביר] ופתחה מחדש את השמיעה ב[תאריך] בהתאמה לחוק 63.7(a)[(2)][(3)]. הצדדים [היו][לא היו] נוכחים.

Applicable scenarios

  • Reopening due to significant error or new evidence

מתי להשתמש

  • פתיחה מחדש עקב טעות משמעותית או עדות חדשה

Related content

Rule 63.7
Previous wordingReopening – Unavoidably Absent (63.7(a)(1))Next wordingPanel Changed on Reopening for Significant Error (63.7(c)(2))