Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.
Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.
A hearing request form and a hearing decision form are available on the World Sailing website at www.sailing.org/racingrules
The Racing Rules of Sailing does not require a particular hearing request form to be used.
Rule 63 applies to all hearings conducted by the protest committee
A boat or committee may protest a boat.
(a) If a protest concerns an incident observed by the protestor in the racing area:
(b) However, if
then the only requirement for the protestor is to inform the protestee of its intention to protest at the first reasonable opportunity.
(c) If at the time of the incident it is obvious to a protesting boat that a member of either crew is in danger, or that injury or serious damage has resulted, rules 60.2(a) and 60.2(b) do not apply to her, but she shall attempt to inform the other boat within the protest time limit of her intention to protest.
(d) A committee may inform a boat of its intention to protest by posting a notice on the official notice board.
(a) When delivered, a protest shall be in writing and identify the protestor, the protestee, and the incident.
(b) A protest shall be delivered to the race office (or by such other method as stated in the sailing instructions) within the protest time limit unless the protest committee decides there is good reason to extend the time. The protest time limit is
However, if the sailing instructions state a different protest time limit, then that time limit applies instead.
(a) The protest committee shall conduct a hearing as required by rule 63 to decide a protest.
(b) A boat shall only be penalized
(c) If the protest committee decides that a boat has broken a rule it shall disqualify her whether or not the applicable rule was mentioned in the protest. However, the boat shall not be disqualified if
If a boat has broken a rule when not racing, her penalty shall apply to the race sailed nearest in time to the incident.
(d) If the protest committee decides that a boat has broken a class rule:
(a) A request for redress shall be in writing and identify the reason for making it.
(b) A request shall be delivered to the race office (or by such other method as stated in the sailing instructions):
However, the protest committee shall extend the time if there is good reason to do so.
Upon receipt of a report from a boat or a committee, or based on its own observation or information from any source, including evidence taken during a hearing, the protest committee may call a hearing to consider whether a support person has broken a rule.
If the protest committee decides to call a hearing, it shall conduct a hearing as required by rule 63 and may appoint a person to present the allegations.
If the protest committee decides that a support person who is a party to the hearing has broken a rule, it may
In addition, if the protest committee decides that
then the protest committee may also penalize a boat that is a party to the hearing for the breach of a rule by a support person by changing the boat’s score in a single race, up to and including disqualification.
When a boat reports within the protest time limit that she has broken a rule which is subject to a discretionary penalty, the protest committee shall decide the appropriate penalty having first considered the evidence that it considers appropriate. There is no requirement to hold a hearing.
(a) A protest committee acting under this rule shall have at least three members.
(b) When a protest committee, from its own observation or from information received from any source, including evidence taken during a hearing, believes a person may have broken rule 69.1(a), it shall decide whether or not to call a hearing.
(c) When the protest committee needs more information to make the decision to call a hearing, it shall consider appointing a person or persons to conduct an investigation. These investigators shall not be members of the protest committee that will decide the matter.
(d) When an investigator is appointed, all relevant information gathered by the investigator, favourable or unfavourable, shall be disclosed to the protest committee, and if the protest committee decides to call a hearing, to the parties.
(e) If the protest committee decides to call a hearing, it shall promptly inform the person in writing of the alleged breach and of the time and place of the hearing and follow the procedures in rule 63, except that:
(f) If a party
(g) The standard of proof to be applied is the test of the comfortable satisfaction of the protest committee, bearing in mind the seriousness of the alleged misconduct. However, if the standard of proof in this rule conflicts with the laws of a country, the national authority may, with the approval of World Sailing, change it with a prescription to this rule.
(h) When the protest committee decides that a competitor or boat owner has broken rule 69.1(a), it may take one or more of the following actions
(i) When the protest committee decides that a support person has broken rule 69.1(a), rules 62.3 and 62.4 apply. (j) If the protest committee
it shall report its findings, including the facts found, its conclusions and decision to the national authority of the person or, for major international events listed in the World Sailing Code of Ethics, to World Sailing. If the protest committee has acted under rule 69.2(f)(2), the report shall also include that fact and the reasons for it.
(k) If the protest committee decides not to conduct the hearing without a party present, or if the protest committee has left the event and a report alleging a breach of rule 69.1(a) is received, the race committee or organizing authority may appoint the same or a new protest committee to proceed under this rule. If the protest committee decides it is impractical to conduct a hearing, it shall collect all available information and, if the allegation seems justified, make a report to the national authority of the person or, for major international events listed in the World Sailing Code of Ethics, to World Sailing.
The disciplinary powers, procedures and responsibilities of national authorities and World Sailing that apply are specified in the World Sailing Code of Ethics. National authorities and World Sailing may impose further penalties, including suspension of eligibility, under that code.
A protest committee may request confirmation or correction of its decision by the national authority.
There is no right to appeal decisions:
However, (b), (c) and (d) shall only apply if specified in the notice of race or sailing instructions.
In rules 70 to 72, the national authority means the one to which the organizing authority is associated under rule 89.1. However, if boats will pass through the waters of more than one national authority while racing, an appeal or request shall be sent to the national authority where the finishing line is located, unless the sailing instructions identify another national authority.
Appeals and requests shall conform to Appendix R.
A person who has a conflict of interest or was a member of the protest committee shall not take any part in the discussion or decision on an appeal or a request for confirmation or correction.
The national authority shall accept the facts found by the protest committee unless rule R5 applies.
The national authority may:
If the national authority orders a hearing to be reopened, it may limit the scope of the reopened hearing to such issues as it considers appropriate.
A club or other organization affiliated to a national authority may request an interpretation of the rules from the national authority, provided that no protest committee decision that may be appealed is involved. An interpretation shall not be used to change a previous protest committee decision.
A request for redress is invalid if it does not comply with rule 61.2.
(a) A protest committee member shall declare any possible conflict of interest as soon as possible after becoming aware of it.
(b) A party to the hearing who believes a protest committee member has a conflict of interest shall object as soon as possible.
(c) A protest committee member with a conflict of interest shall not be a member of the protest committee for the hearing, unless:
However, for World Sailing major events, or for other events as prescribed by the national authority of the venue, a person who has a conflict of interest shall not be a member of the protest committee.
(d) When deciding whether a conflict of interest is significant, the protest committee shall consider
(e) Any written information provided under rule 63.6(b) shall include any conflict of interest declared by a protest committee member, and any decision by the protest committee under rule 63.3(c)(2).
(a) The protest committee shall consider the evidence and decide what weight to give it. It shall then find the facts based on the balance of probabilities (unless an applicable rule requires otherwise), and then apply the rules to those facts to make its conclusions and a decision.
(b) Decisions shall be made by simple majority vote. When there is an equal division of votes, the chair of the hearing may cast an additional vote.
(c) If there is a conflict between
then the protest committee shall apply the rule that it believes will provide the fairest result for all boats affected.
(d) If the protest committee is in doubt about the meaning of a class rule, it shall refer its questions, together with the relevant facts, to an authority responsible for interpreting the rule. In making its decision, the protest committee is bound by the authority’s reply.
(a) The protest committee may reopen a hearing if it decides
However, a protest committee shall reopen a hearing when required to do so by the national authority under rule 71.3 or R5.
(b) A party to the hearing may request a reopening by delivering a written request to the race office (or by such other method as stated in the sailing instructions) no later than 24 hours after being informed of the decision. The request shall identify the reason for making it. However, on the last scheduled day of racing the request shall be delivered
(c) The protest committee shall consider all requests to reopen a hearing. When a request to reopen is being considered, or when the hearing is reopened,