Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.
Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.
Appendices
This appendix is advisory only; in some circumstances changing these procedures may be advisable. It is addressed primarily to the protest committee chair but may also help judges, protest committee secretaries, race committees and others involved in hearings.
In a hearing, the protest committee should weigh all testimony with equal care; should recognize that honest testimony can vary, and even be in conflict, as a result of different observations and recollections; should resolve such differences as best it can; should recognize that no boat or competitor is guilty until a breach of a rule has been established to the satisfaction of the protest committee; and should keep an open mind until all the evidence has been heard as to whether a boat or competitor has broken a rule.
SITEMAP.XML • HE
Unless World Sailing has appointed a person for the role, the protest committee may appoint a person to present the allegation. This person might be a race official, the person making the allegation or other appropriate person. When no reasonable alternative person is available, a person who was appointed as a member of the protest committee may present the allegation.
Rule M6.2
A competitor or a boat cannot protest under rule 69 , but the hearing request form of a competitor who tries to do so may be accepted as a report to the protest...
Rule M6.4
When it is desirable to call a hearing under rule 69 as a result of a Part 2 incident, it is important to hear any boat-vs.-boat protest in the normal way, deci...
