Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

EN • HE

EN

Validity

Conclusions on validity of protests, requests for redress, and requests to reopen.

Invalid Request for Redress – Not in Writing or Missing Reasons (61.2(a))

HE

תקפות

מסקנות בנוגע לתקפות של ערעורים, בקשות לפיצויים ובקשות לפתיחה מחדש.

בקשת פיצוי לא תקפה – לא בכתב או חסרת נימוקים (61.2(a))

Wording

The request for redress [was not in writing] [and] [did not identify the reasons for making it], as required by RRS 61.2(a). Therefore the request for redress is invalid under RRS 61.3.

נוסח

הבקשה לפיצוי [לא הוגשה בכתב][ו][לא זיהתה את הסיבה לכך], כפי שנדרש בחוק 61.2(a). לפיכך הבקשה לפיצוי לא תקפה על פי חוק 61.3.

Applicable scenarios

  • Request for redress not properly filed

מתי להשתמש

  • בקשת פיצוי לא הוגשה כראוי

Notes

  • Requests for redress

הערות

  • בקשות לפיצוי

Related content

Rule 61.2Rule 61.3
Previous wordingValidity – Failed to Deliver Other Protests Within Time Limit (60.3(b)(2))Next wordingRequest for Redress Validity – Late for Racing Area Incident (61.2(b)(1))