Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

EN • HE

EN

Validity

Conclusions on validity of protests, requests for redress, and requests to reopen.

Invalid – Failed to Attempt to Inform Despite Obvious Danger or Injury (60.2(c))

HE

תקפות

מסקנות בנוגע לתקפות של ערעורים, בקשות לפיצויים ובקשות לפתיחה מחדש.

לא תקף – כשלון בניסיון להודיע למרות סכנה ברורה (60.2(c))

Wording

At the time of the incident it was obvious to Y that [a crew member was in danger] [(injury) (serious damage) resulted]. Nevertheless, Y failed to attempt to inform X of the protest within the protest time limit, as required by RRS 60.2(c). Therefore the protest is invalid under RRS 60.4(a)(1).

נוסח

בזמן התקרית היה ברור ל-Y ש [איש צוות נמצא בסכנה][שנגרמו (פציעה)(נזק חמור)]. אף על פי כן, Y כשלה מלהודיע ל-X על הערעור בתוך מגבלת זמן הערעורים, כפי שנדרש בחוק 60.2(c). לפיכך הערעור אינו תקף על פי חוק 60.4(a)(1).

Applicable scenarios

  • Failed to inform despite obvious danger or injury

מתי להשתמש

  • כשלון להודיע למרות סכנה ברורה

Related content

Rule 60.2Rule 60.4
Previous wordingInvalid – PC Failed to Inform at First Reasonable Opportunity (60.2(b)(4))Next wordingInvalid – Appendix B: Failed to Hail Protest (B5.60.2(a)(1))