Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

EN • HE

EN

Validity

Conclusions on validity of protests, requests for redress, and requests to reopen.

Invalid Protest – Appendix B 60.4(a)(2) (B5.60.4)

HE

תקפות

מסקנות בנוגע לתקפות של ערעורים, בקשות לפיצויים ובקשות לפתיחה מחדש.

ערעור לא תקף – נספח B 60.4(a)(2) (B5.60.4)

Wording

The protest refers to an alleged breach of [a RRS of Part 2] [RRS 31] by X. However, Y was not involved in the incident. Therefore, the protest is invalid under RRS 60.4(a)(2) as changed by RRS B5.60.4.

נוסח

הערעור מתייחס להפרה לכאורה של [חוק מחלק 2][חוק 31] על ידי X. למרות ש-Y לא היה מעורב בתקרית. לפיכך הערעור לא תקף על פי חוק 60.4(a)(2) כפי שהשתנה בחוק B5.60.4.

Applicable scenarios

  • Boardsailing protest invalid due to uninvolved party

מתי להשתמש

  • ערעור גלשנות לא תקף בשל צד לא מעורב

Related content

Rule 60.4Rule B5-60.4
Previous wordingValid Protest – Technical Committee Inspection Preceded (60.4(c)(3))Next wordingInvalid – Failed to Hail Protest and Display Flag (60.2(a)(1))