Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

Validity

Conclusions on validity of protests, requests for redress, and requests to reopen.

Invalid Protest – No Injury or Serious Damage (60.4(c)(1)(2))

Wording

Furthermore, the incident involving X neither resulted in injury nor serious damage, nor did the PC learn during the hearing of a valid protest that X who was not a party to that hearing was involved in the incident and may have broken a rule. Therefore the protest is invalid under RRS 60.4(c)(1) or RRS 60.4(c)(2).

Applicable scenarios

  • Committee protest where no injury/damage occurred and no non-party involvement learned

Notes

  • Add after 60.4(b) when necessary

Related content

Rule 60.4
Previous wordingInvalid Protest – Based on Redress or Conflict of Interest (60.4(b))Next wordingInvalid Protest – No Technical Committee Inspection (60.4(c)(3))