Redress Conclusion – Grant Redress: Score/Place Made Significantly Worse

Y's [score] [place] in [race ##] [the series] was made significantly worse through no fault of her own by [improper action or improper omission of the (race committee) (protest committee) (organizing authority) (technical committee)] [(injury) (physical damage) because of the action of X that was breaking RRS [rule of Part 2] and [(took an appropriate penalty) (was penalized)]] [(injury) (physical damage) because of the action of X, a vessel that (was required to keep clear) (is determined to be at fault under [(the IRPCAS) (a government right-of-way rules)])] [giving help in compliance with RRS 1.1 to someone other than herself or her crew] [an action of [X] [Z] that resulted in a (penalty under RRS 2) (warning under RRS 69) (penalty under RRS 69)]. Therefore, the requirements for redress in RRS 61.4(b) [(1)] [(2)] [(3)] [(4)] [(5)] are met.

Applicable scenarios

• Score or place made significantly worse through no fault of own
• requirements for redress under RRS 61.4(b) are met

Notes

• Select the applicable sub-clause(s) of RRS 61.4(b).