Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.
Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.
EN • HE
EN
Protest Conclusions
HE
מסקנות בערעור
Since Y obtained an inside overlap [from clear astern] [by tacking to windward of Z] and, from the time the overlap began, Z was unable to give mark-room, Z was not required to give it in accordance with RRS 18.2(d).
מאחר ש -Y השיגה חיפוי פנימי[מברור לאחור][על ידי סיבוב מעל הרוח של Z] ומרגע שהחיפוי החל, Z לא יכלה לתת מקום בסימון, Z לא נדרשת לתת מקום בסימון בהתאמה לחוק 18.2(d)