Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room

ClassNational

Appendix

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Navigation menu

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Home

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room

ClassNational

Appendix

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Navigation menu

Rules Explorer
Case Book
Prescriptions
Q&A
Guides

Home

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

EN • HE

Protest Conclusions

Conclusions for protests

Appendix F Presumption Not Overlapped

מסקנות בערעור

מסקנות לגבי ערעורים

נספח F חזקת אי-חיפוי

Wording

Since there was reasonable doubt that X and Y were overlapped, it is presumed that they were not, in accordance with RRS F Definition Clear Astern and Clear Ahead; Overlap.

נוסח

כיוון שישנו ספק סביר ש X ו- Y היו בחיפוי, ההנחה שהם לא היו בחיפוי, בהתאמה להגדרה: בבירור מאחור, בבירור מלפנים וחיפוי בנספח F.

Applicable scenarios

Kiteboard presumption of not overlapped when reasonable doubt exists

מתי להשתמש

חזקת אי-חיפוי כשיש ספק סביר

Notes

To apply this rule, the facts must include that the positions of the kiteboard relative to each other in regard to the overlap could not be established

הערות

כדי להחיל חוק זה, העובדות חייבות לכלול את העובדה שלא ניתן היה לקבוע שמיקומי גלשני המצנח זה ביחס לזה היו בחיפוי