Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement

Procedural Matters

Conclusions on procedural matters

Representation of Parties

Wording

[X] [Y] was represented by [##]. The protest committee decided there is a good reason to allow [name] who was not on board at the time of the incident to represent [X] [Y] as per RRS 63.1(a)(4).

Applicable scenarios

  • Allowing an external representative for a party

Related content

Rule 63.1
Previous wordingFull Panel RequestNext wordingHearings Heard Together