Preview notice

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Notice: This site is an early preview and may include errors or omissions. Verify against official sources and do not rely on this site alone when making decisions.

Protest Room logoProtest Room
Appendix
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
Navigation menu
  • Rules Explorer
  • Case Book
  • Prescriptions
  • Q&A
  • Guides
  1. Home/
  2. Cases/
  3. Case case-115

© 2026 Protest Room

Sources & AttributionPrivacy statement
← Back to all cases

World Sailing Official Case Book

Case 115

Interpretation of the word ‘new’ as used in rule 63.7(a)(3).

World Sailing 2011

Question

What criteria should the protest committee use to decide whether or not evidence is ‘new’?

Answer

Evidence is ‘new’

  • if it was not reasonably possible for the party asking for the reopening to have discovered the evidence before the original hearing,
  • if the protest committee is satisfied that before the original hearing the evidence was diligently but unsuccessfully sought by the party asking for the reopening, or
  • if the protest committee learns from any source that the evidence was not available to the parties at the time of the original hearing.

Related Rules

Rule 63.7(a)(3): Reopening a Hearing
← Previous: 114Next: 116 →